• <div id="y09gn"></div>
  • <li id="y09gn"></li>
    <dl id="y09gn"></dl>
    <div id="y09gn"><s id="y09gn"></s></div>
    来宝网Logo

    热门词:生物显微镜 水质分析仪 微波消解 荧光定量PCR 电化学工作站 生物安全柜

    现在位置首页>医疗器械>牙科>牙科材料> Carisolv伢典祛腐凝胶

    商品编号:54491
    分享

    Carisolv伢典祛腐凝胶

    价    格:询价

    产    地:更新时间:2019/7/15 13:41:34

    品    牌:Orasolv型    号:Carisolv

    状    态:正常点击量:4281

    18253171090
    联系我时,请说明是在来宝网上看到的,谢谢!

    济南安环医疗器械有限公司

    联 系 人:李经理

    电     话:18253171090

    传     真:

    等     级: (第 5年)

    性     质:生产型,

    联系我时请说在来宝网上看到的,谢谢!




    英文名Carisolv ,瑞典Mediteam公司技术。用于牙本质龋坏组织去除,不用或少用牙钻,具有无痛、不损?#21040;?#24247;牙齿,
    无恐惧、无交叉感染等优势。Carisolv伢典是一种化学-机械法治疗龋齿的无痛微创去腐?#24405;?#26415;,它是先采用化学凝胶使龋
    洞内的龋坏组 织软化然后使用专用的手工工具将软化的龋坏组织轻柔地刮除的技术。使用伢典在治疗过程中不需要使用牙钻
    和局部麻醉,无疼痛,无噪音,使患者可以在轻松、友好的环下接受治疗。

    ????
          ? Carisolv诞生1975年,由瑞典多所大学和Mediteam Dental AB合作开发研制并于一九九七年正式在瑞典市场上?#23567;?/span>
    因其先进的龋齿祛腐概念,在全球享有美誉。相继获?#38376;分轈 E?#29616;ぁ?/span>美国FDA上市许可、ISO9001质量体?#31561;现ぁ?2001年,
    Carisolv?? 来到中国,并以伢典作为产品的中文名。此前Carisolv 已在全球58个国家(地区)临床?? 使用,在很多国家已成
    为常规治疗方法。临床上已有近50万患者使用过Carisolv 进行治疗。

    ????
            2003年2月伢典?? 被中国初级卫生保健基金会指定为全 国龋病普查和防?#20301;?#21160;的唯一专用产品。

    ?

    产品优势

    ??????? ※ 治疗无痛苦,无噪音,患者感觉舒适。

    ??????? ※ 避免牙钻及麻醉的使用,患者无恐惧?#23567;?/p>

    ??????? ※ 彻底去除龋坏组织,不损伤健康牙体组织,有效延长牙齿寿命。

    ??????? ※ 去腐后牙体组织表面粗糙,与充填材料粘结力强,可预防补牙后充填材料脱落。

    ??????? ※ 操作简便,无交叉感染,无任何毒副作用,使患者可以在轻松、友好的环境下接受治疗

    安全有效

    伢典的安全性

    ?

    无牙髓副作用

    伢典应用到深龋洞对牙髓没有不良影响。如果作用时间短,?#35789;?#30452;接作用于牙髓,也没有副作用

    ?

    对细菌的影响

    次?#20154;?#38048;有抗菌作用,伢典可以有效的杀死根面龋的微生物。

    ?

    对软组织及黏膜无不良影响

    伢典对口腔黏膜没有不良影响。

    ?

    伢典的有效性

    ?

    临床研?#24656;?#23454;可以去净腐质

    迄今为止,很多研究表明,用伢典治疗牙本质龋可以去净腐质,形成无龋的牙本质表面。

    治疗前
    治疗后
    伢典治疗深龋效果图

    ?

    一年后的临床跟踪结果

    伢典 治疗1年后临床观察发现,与牙钻相?#40843;?#20108;者的继发龋形成、充填体脱落和其它并发
    症发生率无明显差异。

    ?

    去净腐质的离体研究

    一些离体或临床前期研究显示,伢典可以有效去除牙本质龋坏。

    ?

    选择性软化不饱和牙本质,对健康牙本质和牙釉质没有影响。

    研究表明伢典 凝胶仅软化龋坏牙本质,对健康牙釉质或牙本质没有影响。

    下表为各种祛腐方法的祛腐效果评价(+号表示作用效果)

    ?

    方法
    正常牙釉质
    正常牙本质
    龋坏牙釉质
    龋坏牙本质
    注释
    伢典
    +++
    尚需车针辅助
    旋转车针
    +++
    +++
    +++
    +++
    气动、?#36864;?#38075;机
    手用挖匙
    +
    ++
    ?
    喷砂
    +++
    +++
    ++
    +
    与粘结材料有关
    抛光
    +
    +
    +
    需硬表面材料
    超声
    +
    +
    +
    适于根尖倒充填
    Sono-abrasion
    +
    +
    ++
    需进一步研究
    激光
    +
    +
    +
    +
    与波长强度有关
    +
    需进一步研究

    ?

    良好的牙本?#25910;?#32467;性

    现代牙科充填材料与伢典祛腐后的牙本?#25910;辰有?#21644;它与牙钻祛腐后的牙本?#25910;辰有?#30456;当或更好。

    ?

    牙钻与伢典祛腐结果对比
    放大75倍的对比图
    放大1500倍的对比图
    使用牙钻洞型对称,健康牙体组织被清除,牙髓暴露。(左图)
    使用伢典牙洞表面不平坦,健康牙质被保留,牙髓没有暴露。(右图)
    牙钻清除的龋 牙钻祛腐的牙质表面?#20132;?#35206;有一些玷污层。(左图)
    伢典处理过的龋洞表面不平坦,有利于提高牙本质的粘结性能。(右图)
    去腐后洞壁表面形态
    伢典去腐表面形态


    横切面


    纵切面

    ? ?
    车针去腐表面形态

    横切面
    ?

    纵切面

    作用原理

    传统车针祛腐原理
      
         1893年GV Black提出预防性扩展理论,即牺牲部分健康牙齿?#21592;?#35777;窝洞的抗力形和固位
    
    
    形,预防性扩展以防止继发龋坏。临床操作上使用高速车针来获取达到龋损的入口,用?#36864;?
    
    
    手机祛除牙本质龋坏。
    ?
    伢典凝胶祛腐原理
      
         伢典的研制及开发是基于对龋病病理学认识的?#27426;?#21457;展、深入的基础上的。在龋坏的牙
    
    
    体组织中,龋损的最外层为坏死区,这部分组织因细菌产生的酸使组织完全脱矿,胶原纤维变
    
    
    性坏死,这部分坏死组织在治疗过程中必须去除?#27426;?#40843;?#30340;?#23618;的牙本质中虽有部分矿物质溶
    
    
    解,胶原纤维变性,但该层组织的脱矿与胶原纤维的变性均为可逆性的,当细菌及酸的刺激
    
    
    去除后,这层部分脱矿的牙本质可再矿化为健康的牙体组织,因此在治疗过程中要求保存内
    
    
    层龋坏组织。
       
        众所周知,次?#20154;?#30416;是一种强有力的氧化氯化物质,它可分解坏死的组织,但同时对健康
    
    
    的组织也有损伤作用。Carisolv伢典凝胶是由次?#20154;?#30416;与?#34987;?#37240;的复合体构成的,在pH?#21040;细?
    
    
    时,次?#20154;?#30416;与?#34987;?#37240;混合后发生反应,形成比较稳定的新物质――氯代?#34987;?#37240;,此时氯离子
    
    
    的活性降低,但其电性被保留下来了。在龋坏外层牙本质中,胶原纤维完全变性坏死,网状结
    
    
    构破坏,使其平时隐蔽的结合位点暴露。Carisolv伢典可通过电荷吸引作用,高度选择性地结
    
    
    ?#29616;?#40843;坏组织,使其纤维结构完全破坏,组织变疏松、软化,从而使用专门设计的手工器械即
    
    
    可轻柔地去除。 
    ?
    ?
    伢典手工工具祛腐原理
    ?
         手工器械是经特殊设计的手工工具,它可高效地去除被凝胶软化的龋坏组织。与手工
    
    
    挖匙或牙钻等具有锐切角的工具不同,传统工具具有锐切角的工具在操作时很难控制其深度
    
    
    ,稍有不慎即容易损伤健康的牙体组织(见?#23478;唬欢?#25163;工工具虽?#22351;?#21475;锋利,但其切角是
    
    
    钝角,即工具支撑面很广,因而在刮除被凝胶软化的龋坏组织时,用力方向不会下行,能够
    
    
    精确地掌握工具所到达的深?#40843;?#35265;图二)。
    ?
    ? ?

    ?

    适用领域

    (使用前请先详细阅读产品使用说明书)
    Carisolv伢典可适用于各种牙本质龋坏组织的去除,但在以下领域具有其独到的优越性:
    ?
    >根面龋的治疗
    简单、安全、迅速、高效、无痛感(下图是去腐前后的比较左:去腐前。右:去腐后)
    ? ?

    ?

    >深龋的治疗

    细致、安全、更少牙髓损伤风险、极少术后问题(左:去腐前。右去腐后)
    ? ?

    ?

    >儿童龋齿治疗

    安?#30149;?#28201;和、易与医生配合;消除儿童对补牙的恐惧感?#25442;?#32773;现在及未来的积极态度

    ?

    使用说明

    1、去掉两支注射器顶?#20445;?#23558;两支注射器顶端对?#26377;?#32039;,来回推动两端的活塞8~10次,使两管内的凝胶充分混合(见图1,2)。
    2、将凝胶推入一管内,然后小心地挤出适量已混合均匀的凝胶至合适的容器中开始使用(见图 3,4)。或配上针头,直接滴于龋洞中。
    3、用Carisolv伢典工具将凝胶滴入龋洞内,?#27426;?#35201;确保所有龋坏部分完全被凝胶浸湿(见图 5) 。
    4、至少等待30秒,使凝胶充分软化龋坏组织(见图6)。
    5、根据龋洞的部位、大小及类型,选择合适的Carisolv伢典手工工具,通过轻柔的刮擦或旋转动作将龋洞内软化的龋坏组织清除(见图7) 。用Carisolv伢典工具或干棉球将已经刮擦掉的龋坏组织清除。
    6、如果龋质?#24418;?#28165;理干净,可再放一些凝胶继续刮除,?#31895;馗床?#39588;3,5(见图8),直到凝胶不再浑浊为止。?#24405;?#20837;凝胶后不用再等待,可连续进行操作。
    7、当感觉到窝洞里的龋质被清理干净时,清除剩余凝胶并用潮湿的棉球擦净窝洞或用水将其冲洗干净,采用温水冲洗更为理想。
    8、利用尖头的探针检查腐质是否已清除干净,特别注意检查釉牙本质界处(见图9)。
    9、如有必要可以使用Carisolv伢典手工工具或者牙钻,修整牙洞边缘。然后选择具粘结力的充填材料对龋洞进行充填。

    ?
    有效提高临床操作效率
    1.?#28909;?#27934;口釉质,再将凝胶用于牙本质龋祛腐。
    2.不同部位用不同工具:
    a.似球钻者(多棱花头、四棱星状头、三棱星状头)用于侧壁。
    b.扁平头用于近髓区。
    c.扁头用于釉牙本质界及点状、线状残留腐质去除,
    3.保?#36136;右?#28165;析(看不清时用干棉清理浑浊凝胶),有针对性祛腐。
    4.明确祛腐干净标准,在硬度达到正常后?#35789;?#26377;颜色?#21442;?#38656;再继续清理。
    ?
    祛腐干净的标准
    确定龋洞内的腐质是否去除干净有两个标准:
    采用常规的检查方法,使用探针探查洞内。去腐后牙体组织?#23454;?#27604;较坚硬,则表明龋坏组织清除干净。
    通过观察龋洞内凝胶的透明程度。若龋坏组织没去除干净,则凝胶会比较混浊?#22351;?#20957;胶变澄清了,则表明龋坏组织已去除干净。
    ?
    操作流程图:
    ???????????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ???????
    ???????????????????????
    ???????????????????????????????????????????
    ??????????????????????

    ?

    适用范围

    初次使用产品注意事项
    ?
    ?
    (使用前请先详细阅读产品使用说明书)
    ?
    初次使用时,请选择一些完全暴露,容易接近的龋损,如至少有1~2毫米开口的凝胶,而应避免尝?#38405;?#20123;不容易接近的龋损。

    初次使用时,避免应用于一些有牙科恐惧症的患者,应先找比较容忍的患者进行练习,直到对疗法熟悉而充满信心。?#35805;?#26469;说,一名临床医师大约需要治疗15~20例临床病例,即可熟练而高效地掌握该项技术。

    对于无法直接获得入口或旧充填物残留影响操作的龋洞,?#19978;?#37197;合使用牙钻或其它工具获取进入龋损区的入口或将原来的充填物清除,然后再使用本产品去除龋坏组织。

    操作时慢慢来,?#27426;?#19981;能着?#20445;?#22312;开始时,凝胶至少需要与龋坏组织作用30秒,才可以开始用手工工具清理龋坏组织?#27426;?#22312;治疗过程中新添加的凝胶则不需要等待,可以连续地进行操作。

    在祛腐过程中,不宜吹干或冲?#27425;?#27934;,若患者唾液较多,应先进行隔湿。

    产品两种成分混合后30分钟内祛腐效?#39318;?#20339;,30分钟后其祛腐效率将逐渐降低。
    ?

    治疗效果

    ???????????????????????
    ?
    临床病例 1

    ???????????????????????
    ?????????????????????????????????? 祛腐前


    祛腐后

    ?
    ?
    ?
    临床病例 2


    祛腐前


    祛腐中


    祛腐后


    充填后
    ?

    ?
    临床病例 3


    祛腐前


    祛腐后

    ?
    提示说明

    ???????

    ???????? 该产品对人体健康或者环境没有危险。?

    ???????? 皮肤接触:用水冲?#30784;?

    ???????  眼睛接触:用水冲?#30784;?#22914;果有需要,就找医生解决.

    ???????  溢出或不小心外溅:擦干并用水冲?#30784;?br />
    ???????? 可燃性:遇火不燃。

    ?
    ?
    发展趋势
    龋齿无痛微创治疗是牙科技术发展的必然趋势
     
    全面认识牙本质龋的不同区域及功能
      
    龋坏牙本质外层:坏死区?#21644;?#20840;脱矿,胶原坏死,含有大量细菌,治疗时应完全祛除。
    龋坏牙本质内层:胶原部分可逆变性,祛除外层龋坏牙本质,内层牙本质的胶原可以再矿化,治疗时应予?#21592;?#30041;。
    透明层:接近健康牙本质,本层矿物含量和硬度都有所增加。
    ?
    龋齿传统治疗方法不足之处
    ※疼痛。牙钻产生的压力和温度使患者感觉疼痛难忍,极不舒适,有时难以配合完成治疗,尤其是儿童。
    ※创伤性。使用牙钻切割去腐无法控制工作的深?#40843;?#22312;去除龋坏的同时部分健康的牙体组织或能?#25351;?#30340;组织(再矿化)也被去除,使剩余牙体组织薄弱,容易折裂,缩短牙齿使用寿命;另外,在近髓区操作很容?#33258;?#25104;露髓。
    ※恐惧感。钻牙过程?#26800;?#22122;音、麻醉、疼?#35789;?#24739;者对龋齿的治疗极度恐惧。
    ※交叉感染的隐患。钻牙过程中产生?#21335;?#24494;粉尘会造成医生和患者间的交叉感染。
    ?
    伢典化学机械法无痛微创龋齿治疗技术
    为了确保天然牙齿的最长寿命,必须注意防止损?#21040;?#24247;牙体组织。同时治疗过程中应尽量减轻患者的疼痛,以适应个性化治疗的原则。无痛微创技术必然成为医疗领域的发展趋势,随着现代修复材料?#27426;?#23436;善和发展以及对龋病发病机理认识的深入,无痛、微创治疗龋齿的技术已成为可能。
    伢典是牙科领域的又一个突破,它提供了一种全新龋齿祛腐新概念。伢典 治疗技术是以化学凝胶将龋洞内的龋坏组织软化,然后使用专用的手工工具轻柔地将龋坏组织去除 。
    ?
    ?
        
    传统祛腐和充填效果
     
        
    现代微创祛腐和修复效果
    ?
    ?
    储藏运输
    ?
    ??????? 产品的运输、储藏
    ?
    ?

    ????? ※ 运输过程中可常温保存一周而不影响产品的有效性。

    ????? ※ 未开封的凝胶需冷藏( 4~10 ℃),避光保存。
    ?
    ?
    ?
    常见问题
    ?
    伢典的优点是什么?
    伢典的优点主要包括:选择性地祛除龋坏的牙本质,最大限度地保存健康牙体组织?#25442;?#32773;感觉舒适,无痛感,大大避免及减少牙钻和局部麻醉的使用;安静,安全和有效的治疗方法;降低?#25628;?#31185;治疗过程?#26800;?#20132;叉感染。

    对牙髓、软组织有无损伤?如果不小心溅入眼睛内是否有不良影响?
    伢典对牙髓及软组织没有任何刺激作用。伢典在其上市之前已做过严格的安全测试,目前已有大量研究表明,伢典对牙髓、口腔粘膜及软组织均无刺激,如果不小心溅入眼睛内,立即用大量的水冲洗,若将凝胶去除后仍有刺激症状,则请尽快上医院眼科进行进一步处理。

    为何采用伢典凝胶治疗时患者的疼痛会明显减轻?
    使用伢典进行治疗,在整个治疗过程中没有牙钻产生的振动和热刺激;健康牙体组织不被损害;去腐操作较轻柔,环境较安静,对患者有正面的心理效应。

    在治疗过程中如何减轻疼痛?
    治疗中引起疼痛的最常见的因素是手工工具的压力及冷水的刺激。所以在治疗过程中保证凝胶充分覆盖在龋洞周围,避免冲洗或吹干窝洞;使用手工工具进行操作时动作尽量轻柔。另外在治疗前向患者说明治疗的情况,获得患者充分配合也是非常重要的。

    是否需要联合应用车针?什么情况下应使用车针?
    大多数类型的龋损可使用伢典完全清除干净,但对于一些特殊类型的龋损需联合应用车针进行治疗,如当龋洞为口小底大的情况,洞口有釉质阻挡不利于操作,需用车针进行钻磨,打通治疗通道?#25442;?#26377;一种情况就是,当龋洞内残留有旧充填物时,可用车针将这些旧的充填物去除,当钻这些部位时,患者是不会感觉到疼痛的。另外当龋质去除干净后,若洞缘有无基釉时,需用车针将其去除,去除这部分无基釉时可将凝胶保留在洞内或先垫底后再进?#23567;?

    操作过程中是否需要隔湿?
    因伢典凝胶对牙龈及口腔粘膜均无刺激作用,故在操作过程中?#35805;?#19981;需要隔湿,但如果患者的唾液非常多,容易进入龋洞内影响治疗的则建议用棉球进行隔湿。

    为什么治疗过程中不能用水冲洗?
    在治疗过程中用水冲洗会使龋洞内的凝胶被稀释,使凝胶的去腐效?#24335;?#20302;;另外在用水冲?#35789;保?#20919;水会对牙髓造成不良的温度刺激,引起患者疼痛。
    ?
    为什么应该使用伢典专用的手工工具?
    伢典的手工工具是经过专门设计的,其大小和形态可以适用于不同部位、不同类型和不同大小的龋损;另外手工工具的工作端在工作时对健康的牙体组织没有损害。而普通的挖匙形态比?#31995;?#19968;,且容易损伤健康的牙体组织。

    腐质去净的标准是什么?
    龋洞内的腐质是否去除干净有两个标准:一个是采用常规的检查方法,使用探针探查洞内,去腐后牙体组织?#23454;?#27604;较坚硬,则表明龋坏组织清除干净了;另外通过观察龋洞内凝胶的透明程度?#37096;?#20197;判断,若龋坏组织没去除干净,则凝胶会比较混浊?#22351;?#20957;胶变澄清了,则表明龋坏组织已去除干净。

    是不是需要使用特殊的充填材料?
    不需要使用特殊的充填材料,因去腐后没有标准的洞型,故建议使用具有粘结力的充填材料,并按材料的使用说明进行操作。

    在充填前是否需要酸蚀?
    酸蚀与否根据准备选用的充填材料而定,如果将选用的充填材料需要酸蚀,则按材料的使用说明进行酸蚀,?#31895;?#21017;否。

    术后并发症如继发龋、充填物脱落等的发生情况如何?
    伢典可高度选择性地精确去净龋坏组织,且去腐后洞壁表面粗糙,凹凸不平,非常有利于与充填材料的粘结。大量临床随访调查研究表明,使用伢典治疗继发龋、充填物脱落等术后并发症的发生率与传统车针相?#40843;?#26080;明显差异,甚至并发症的发生?#24335;?#36710;针治疗者明显减少。
    ?
    ?
    开发研制?
    ?????
    ????? 龋病是最为常见的口?#24739;?#30149;,因其发病率高、波及面广,而被 WHO列为危害人类健康的三大疾病之一。

    目前龋病的治疗方法是采用高速旋转的车针切割牙齿,达到去除龋坏组织的目的。这种传统方法在治疗的

    同时容易导致对健康牙体组织的损坏,另外治疗过程中机械及温度的刺激会导致患者疼痛及一些术后并

    发症。随着医学技术的?#27426;?#21457;展及人们对治疗质量和舒适度要求的?#27426;?#25552;高,这种龋病治疗方法显然不

    能满足医生及广大患者的需求。

      牙齿作为人体的一个重要组织器官,其寿命及完整性对提高人类生活质量有非常重要的意义。微创

    技术是医疗领域发展的必然趋势,同时也是牙科领域发展的主要趋势。众所周知,要使天然牙维?#21046;?#26368;

    长寿命的前提就是尽可能保持更多的牙体组织。因此,因各种因素导致牙体组织缺损而需要进行牙科治

    疗时,采用微创技术?#21592;?#23384;更多健康组织非常重要。尽管有少数医生还没意识到微创的重要性或?#24418;?#20934;

    备好接受微创治疗技术,但已有越来越多的医生对如何保存更多的健康牙体组织给予充分的关注。

      瑞典 MediTeam Dental AB公司是一家专门从事口?#24739;?#30149;预防、治疗研究和口腔器械制造的国?#25163;?/p>

    名公司,在微创治疗技术的研究和临床应用方面尤为领先。公司由R&D委员会确定科研方向,并指导公

    司用瑞典和世界市场通?#26800;?#36136;量标准来进行科学研究,获得?#21335;?#36164;料,使牙医在使用MediTeam公司的产

    品时感觉安全放心。委员会包括Malmo牙科学院的Per-Olof Glantz和Konglas Brantthall教授,以及Goteborg牙科学院的Jan Lindhe教授。他们在牙科学领域特别是牙科材料、龋病学和牙周病学等方面

    享有盛誉。在MediTeam公司的发起下,瑞典多所大学的口腔界学者和科学家们自1975年开?#27982;?#20999;合作,

    开发研制如何运用化学-机械综合疗法治疗龋齿及保持健康牙体组织。Christer Hedward、Lars Strid

    、Dan Ericson和Rolf Bornstein等科学家经过经二十年的联合研究,开发出Carisolv伢典化学-机械

    法龋齿无痛微创去腐技术,于1995年开始用于第一例患者,并于1997年正式投入临床应用,目前已在

    全球58个国家广泛应用。

    Carisolv伢典为国?#39318;?#21033;产品,获ISO9001质量体系论证、?#20998;轈E?#29616;?#21450;美国FDA上市许可。2003年2月

    被中国初级保健基金会指定为全国龋病普查和防?#20301;?#21160;的专用产品。

    ?
    临?#21442;南?/font>?
    ?
    1. Ericson D, Zimmerman M, Raber H, G?trick B, Bornstein R, Thorell J.
    Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo-mechanical removal of caries: A multi-centre study. Caries Res 1999;33(3) 171-177.
    2. Fure S, Lingstr?m P, Birkhed D.
    Evaluation of Carisolv for the chemo-mechanical removal of primary root caries in vivo. Caries Res 2000;34(3):275-280.
    3. Maragakis GM, Hahn P, Hellwig E.
    Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars and its acceptance by patients. Caries Res 2001;35(3):205-210.
    4. Markovic D, Peric T, Zivojinovic V.
    Chemo-mechanical caries removal efficiency in primary dentition. Balk J Stom 2002; 6(3):194-196
    5. Munshi AK, Hedge AM, Shetty PK.
    Clinical evaluation of Carisolv in the chemico-mechanical removal of carious dentin. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2001;26(1):49-54.
    6. Nadanovsky P, Cohen Carneiro F, Souza de Mello F.
    Removal of caries using only hand instruments: A comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods. Caries Res 2001;35(5):384-389.
    Pre-clinical Studies
    7. Arvidsson A, Stirling C, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A.
    Reactions in the oral mucous membrane after exposure to Carisolv – combined results from a clinical screening test in humans and an experimental study in rats. Gerodontology 2001;18(2):109-113.
    8. Arvidsson A, Milleding P, Wennerberg A.
    The influence of a chemo-mechanical caries removal solution on the topography of dental ceramic materials. Biomaterials 2002;23(19):3977-83.
    9. Arvidsson A, Liedberg B, M?ller K, Lyvén B, Sellén A, Wennerberg A
    Chemical and topographical analyses of dentine surfaces after Carisolv? treatment. J Dent 2002;30:67-75.
    10. Banerjee A, Kidd E A M, Watson T F.
    Scanning electron microscopic observations of human dentine after mechanical caries excavation. J Dent 2000; 28(3):79-186.
    11. Banerjee A, Kidd E A M, Watson TF.
    In vitro Evaluation of Five Alternative Methods of Carious Dentine Excavation. Caries Res 2000;34(2):144-150.
    12. Braun A, Graefen O, Frentzen M, Nolden R.
    Objektiv darstellbare Empfindungen am Zahn w?hrend der Einwirkung von Carisolv. Quintessenz 2000;34(2):144-150.
    13. Cederlund A, Lindskog S, Bloml?f J.
    Efficacy of Carisolv-assisted caries excavation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19(5):465-469.
    14. Cederlund A, Lindskog S, Bloml?f J.
    Effect of a chemo-mechanical caries removal system (Carisolv) on dentin topography of non-carious dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57(4):185-189.
    15. Dammaschke T, Stratmann U, Mokrys K , Kaup M, Ott KHR.
    Histocytological evaluation of the reaction of rat pulp tissue to Carisolv. J Dent 2001;29(4):283-290.
    16. Dammaschke T, D?hne L, Kaup M, Stratmann U, Ott K.
    Effektivit?t von Carisolv im Vergleich zu konventionellen Methoden zur Entfernung kari?sen Dentins. Dtsch Zahn?rztl Z 2001; 56(8): 472-475.
    17. Dammaschke T, Stratmann U, Mokrys K, Kaup M, Ott KHR.
    Reaction of sound and demineralised dentine to Carisolv in vivo and in vitro. J Dent. 2002 Jan;30(1):59-65.
    18. Haak R, Wicht M J, Noack M J.
    Does chemomechanical caries removal affect dentine adhesion? Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108(5):449-455.
    19. Hahn P, Vongerichten M, Hellwig E.
    Comparison of the efficacy of caries removal with Carisolv versus round burs. Dtsch Zahn?rztl Z 2001;56(3):184-188.
    20. Hannig M.
    Effect of Carisolv solution on sound, demineralized and denatured dentin - an ultrastructural investigation. Clin Oral Investig 1999;3(3):155-9
    21. Hosoya Y, Kawashita Y, Marshall GW Jr, Goto G.
    Influence of Carisolv for resin adhesion to sound human primary dentin and young permanent dentin. J Dent 2001;29(3):163-171
    22. Igarashi I, Hashimoto K, Tonami K-I, Shimizu C, Mataki S, Kurosaki N.
    Softening of Carious Dentin by Carisolv Gel. Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 1998;41(4):704-707.
    23. Jepsen S, A?il Y, Zuch B, Albers H-K.
    Biochemical analysis of the collagen structure of residual dentin following chemo-mechanical caries removal (Carisolv). Dtsch Zahn?rztl Z 1999;54(2):120-123.
    24. Kneist S, Heinrich-Weltzien R, St?ber L.
    Zur Mikroflora am Kavit?tenboden von Milchmolaren nach chemomechanischer Kariesexkavation mit Carisolv. Quintessenz 2002;53(5):461-469.
    25. Kubo S, Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ.
    Nanoleakage of dentin adhesive systems bonded to Carisolv treated dentin. Operative Dentistry 2002;27(4):387-395.
    26. Sakoolnamarka R, Burrow MF, Kubo S, Tyas MJ.
    Morphological study of demineralized dentine after caries removal using two different methods. Aust Dent J 2002 Jun;47(2):116-22.
    27. Splieth Ch, Rosin M, Brecke T.
    Carisolv for chemomechanical caries removal versus conventional excavation. Dtsch Zahn?rztl Z 1999;54(2):117-119.
    28. Splieth C, Rosin M, Gellissen B.
    Determination of residual dentine caries after conventional mechanical and chemomechanical caries removal with Carisolv. Clin Oral Investig 2001 Dec;5(4):250-253.
    29. Tonami K, Takagi T, Araki K, Mataki S, Kurosaki N.
    Effect of Carisolv gel on Carious Dentin Collagen. Jap J Cons Dent 1999:42(5):1040-1044.
    30. Wennerberg A, Sawase T, Kultje C .
    The influence of Carisolv on enamel and dentin surface topography. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107(4):297-306.
    31. Yamada Y, Hossain M, Joe T, Kawanaka T, Kinoshita J, Matsumoto K.
    Removal effects of the Er;YAG laser and Carisolv on carious dentin. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2000;18(5):241-245.
    32. Yamada Y, Hossain M, Suzuki N, Kinoshita JI, Nakamura Y, Matsumoto K.
    Removal of carious dentin by Er;YAG laser irradiation with and without Carisolv. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2001;19(3):127-131.
    33. Yazici AR, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B.
    A scanning electron microscopic study of different caries removal techniques on human dentin. Oper Dent 2002;27(4):360-366.
    34. Young C, Bongenhielm U.
    A randomised, controlled and blinded histological and immunohistochemical investigation of Carisolv on pulp tissue. J Dent 2001;29(4):275-281.
    Summaries
    35. Banerjee A, Watson T F, Kidd E A M.
    Dentine caries excavation: a review of current clinical techniques. Br Dent J 2000;188(9): 476-482.
    36. Beeley J A, Yip H K, Stevenson A G.
    Chemochemical caries removal: a review of the techniques and latest developments. Br Dent J 2000;188(8):427-430.
    37. Maragakis GM, Hahn P, Hellwig E.
    Chemomechanical caries removal: a comprehensive review of the literature. Int Dent J. 2001 Aug;51(4):291-299.
    38. Morrow LA, Hassall DC, Watts DC, Wilson NH.
    A chemomechanical method for caries removal. Dent Update 2000;27(8):398-401.
    Abstracts — Clinical studies
    39. Berakdar M, Netuschil L, Lussi A, Reich E.
    Clinical caries treatment with Carisolv or burr evaluated by DIAGNOdent?. Caries Res 2000;34:338 abstract 87 (47th ORCA Congress).
    40. Burke FJTB, Crisp RJ, Hall AF.
    Patients perception after treatment with Carisolv in general dental practice. Abstract BSDR meeting, Leeds, April 1999.
    41. *Carneiro F.C, Teixeira F, Guimar?es L, Dias K, Nadanovsky P.
    Clinical comparison between chemo-mechanical and hand instruments caries removal. J Dent Res 2000;79:295 abstract 1202 (IADR abstracts).
    42. Chaussain Miller C, Toumelin F, Lasfargues J.J.
    Carisolv: a multicentric prospective study prior to commercialisation on french market. J Dent Res 2002 IADR abstract 0025.
    43. *Ericson D, Bornstein R, G?trick B, Raber H, Zimmerman M.
    Clinical multicentre evaluation of a new method for chemo-mechanical caries removal. Caries Res 1998;32:308, abstract 119 (45th ORCA Congress).
    44. *Fure S, Lingstr?m P, Birkhed D.
    Chemo-mechanical removal of root caries compared to drilling. J Dent Res 1999;78:108 abstract 18 (IADR abstracts).
    45. Fure S, Lingstr?m P, Sellén A.
    Chemo-mechanical caries removal with a new modified Carisolv gel. Abstract IADR/PEF meeting, Cardiff, September 2002.
    46. Haffner C, Benz C, Folwaczny M, Hickel R.
    Chemomechanical caries removal – a clinical study. Caries Res 1999;33:312 abstract 93 (46th ORCA Congress).
    47. Kavvadia K, Karagiannis V, Papagiannoulis L.
    Caries removal in deciduous teeth with the Carisolv technique: preliminary results. Abstract 94, 5:th EAPD meeting, Bergen, June 2000.
    48. Kobaslija S, Huseinbegovic A, Tahmiscija H, Prcic A.
    Clinical study of efficacy of caries removal with Carisolv. Abstract 72, 1:st dental congress of Bosnia and Herzegovina with International participation, Sarajevo, October 2001.
    49. Lumbau A, Lai BS, Lai V.
    Evaluation of a chemo-mechanical caries removal method. Abstract 138, 5:th EAPD meeting, Bergen, June 2000.
    50. *Maragakis GM, Hahn P, Hellwig E.
    Clinical evaluation of a new chemomechanical caries removal agent in primary molars. Abstract 93, 5:th EAPD meeting, Bergen, June 2000.
    51. Masouras C, Staikou O, Kakaboura A, Vougiouklakis G.
    A comparative clinical study on Carisolv caries removal method. Abstract IADR/CED, Montpellier, September 1999.
    52. Nevrin K, Karlén M.
    One-year follow-up comparing chemo-mechanical caries excavation with drill. Abstract 56, 82:nd NOF meeting, Naantali, August 1999.
    53. Rafique S, Banerjee A, Fiske J.
    Clinical trial of an air-abrasion/Carisolv gel regimen for restorative treatment for dentally anxious patients. Caries Res 2002:;36(3):186 abstract 39.
    54. Songpaisan Y, Kulsrisombat K, Akrawacharang-kool N, Spirawikrant K, Phantumvanit P.
    Effectiveness of caries removal using Carisolv in A.R.T. technique. J Dent Res 2002 IADR abstract 2121.
    55. *Wennerberg A, Stirling C, K?hler B.
    Clinical evaluation of Carisolv exposure on oral mucosa. Abstract 257, 4:th joint meeting CED / NOF, Warsaw, August 2000.
    56. Zimmerman M, Raber H, G?trick B, Ericson D, Bornstein R, Kultje C.
    Clinical evaluation of a chemo-mechanical caries removal method – 1-year follow-up. Abstract 57, 82:nd NOF meeting, Naantali, Augus, , , , , t 1999.
    Abstracts — Pre-clinical studies
    57. Attari N, Roberts GJ, Ashley P.
    Children's anxiety during caries removal: Carisolv compared with dental drill. J Dent Res 2001;80:674 abstract 1178 (IADR abstracts).
    58. Baysan A, Whiley R, Lynch E.
    Antimicrobial assessment of Carisolv on primary root caries ex-vivo. Abstract 58, 82:nd IADR/NOF, Naantali, August 1999.
    59. Braun A, Christian S, Frentzen M.
    Chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv) in comparison to conventional methods of caries excavation. Caries Res 2001;35(4):310 Abstract 139 (48th ORCA Congress).
    60. Caldo-Teixeira AS, Puppin-Rontani RM.
    Effect of sodium hipochloride on the different dentin substrates – a SEM analyses. J Dent Res 2002 IADR abstract 2605.
    61. Cardoso PEC, Moura SK, Miranda JR, Santos JFF.
    Caries removal: SEM analysis. J Dent Res 2001;80: abstract 317 (AADR/CADR abstracts).
    62. Cornell A, Cornell D, Ericson D.
    The SEM appearance of dentin surfaces and hybrid layers after excavation with Carisolv and a rose-burr. Abstract P29, IADR/NOF, Copenhagen, 2001
    63. Castilho GAA, Rossi FM, Campos WRC, Ferreira RC, Nogueira-Moreira A, Magalhaes CS.
    In vitro evaluation of chemo-mechanical and hand axcavation of carious dentin. Abstract IADR/Brazil, September 2002.
    64. *Dammaschke T, Stratmann U, Ott K.
    Histocytological evaluation on the reaction of pulp and dentin to Carisolv. Abstract AFG-Jahrestagung, Mainz, January 1999.
    65. *Dammaschke T, Stratmann U, Kaup M, Ott K.
    Histologische Ver?nderungen an intaktem und demineralisierten Dentin durch Carisolv. Abstract 13:th Annual Congress of DGZ, Saarbrücken, June 1999.
    66. *Dammaschke T, D?hne L, Kaup M, Stratmann U, Ott K.
    Effektivit?t von Carisolv im Vergleich zu konventionellen Methoden zur Entfernung kari?sen Dentins. Abstract 7:th Annual Congress of GKP, Greifswald, 2000.
    67. Dondi dall'Orologio G, Lorenzi R, Anselmi M.
    Chemo-mechanical vs mechanical caries removal, evaluated with Diagnodent. Abstract IADR/CED, Rome, September 2001.
    68. Erhardt MCG, Amaral CM, Bedran de Castro AKB, Pimenta LAF.
    Influence of use of Carisolv in dentin adhesion. J Dent Res 2001;80: abstract 028 (AADR/CADR abstracts).
    69. Ericson D.
    The efficacy of a new gel for chemo-mechanical caries removal. J Dent Res 1998;77(5):1252 abstract 360.
    70. Frankenberger R, Oberschachtsiek H, Kr?mer N, Petschelt A.
    Bond strength to dentin after mechanical and chemical removal of simulated caries. J Dent Res 1999;78:232 abstract 1015 (IADR abstracts).
    71. Frankenberger R, Oberschachtisiek H, Kr?mer N, Petschelt A.
    Microtensil bond strength to primary dentin after chemomechanical caries removal. J Dent Res 2000;79:372 abstract 1831 (IADR abstracts).
    72. Galler G, Duschner H, G?tz H.
    Migration of Carisolv into sound dentin in vitro: 3D histotomographic studies by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Caries Res 2000;34:338 abstract 88 (47th ORCA Congress).
    73. *Haak R, Fritz U B, Faber F J, Noack M J.
    Influence of chemomechanical caries removal on dentin bonding. J Dent Res 1999;78:369 abstract 2111 (IADR abstracts).
    74. Haffner C, Benz C, Hickel R.
    Efficacy of chemo-mechanical removal of caries. Abstract CONSEURO 2000, Bologna, May 2000.
    75. Hahn P, Trefonski A, Hellwig E.
    Effektivit?t von Fluoridirungsmassnahmen im Wurzeldentin nach Kariesentfernung mit Carisolv. Abstract Jahrestagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Grundlagenforschung, Mainz, January 2001.
    76. *Hannig M, Hoth W.
    Ultrastructural investigation of dentinal surfaces exposed to Carisolv solution. J Dent Res 2000;79:276 abstract 1063 (IADR abstracts).
    77. Harada N, Sonoda H, Shimada Y, Inai N, Otsuki M, Tagami J.
    Effect of chemo-mechanical caries removal on dentin bonding. J Dent Res 2000;79:372 abstract 1832 (IADR abstracts).
    78. *Hosoya Y, Kawashita Y, Goto G.
    Influence of Carisolv on resin adhesion to dentin. J Dent Res 2000;79:372 abstract 1830 (IADR abstracts).
    79. Inaba D, Nagai Y, Minami K, Yonemitsu M, Matsuda K.
    Combined effects of APF and Carisolv? application on acid resistance of dentine lesions in vitro. Caries Res 2000;34:334 abstract 75 (47th ORCA Congress).
    80. Kakaboura A, Eliades G, Vougiouklakis G.
    Effect of Carisolv? on the molecular composition and topography of carious and sound dentin. Abstract IADR/CED, Montpellier, September 1999.
    81. *Kneist S, Heinrich-Weltzien R, St?sser L.
    The occurrence of S. Mutans on the cavity floor after chemo-mechanical caries removal. Abstract IUMS meeting, Sydney, August 1999.
    82. *Kneist S, Heinrich-Weltzien R, St?sser L.
    Zum Vorkommen von Mutans-Streptokokken am Kavit?tenboden von Milchmolaren nach Kariesexkavation mit Carisolv?. Abstract Jahrestagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Grundlagenforschung, Mainz, January 2002.
    83. *Kneist S, Heinrich-Weltzien R, Stoesser L.
    The microflora on the cavity floor after chemo-mechanical caries removal. Caries Res 2002;36(3):197 abstract 72.
    84. Lager A, Thornqvist E, Ericson D.
    Comparison of bacteria in dentine after caries excavation using rose-bur or Carisolv?. Abstract 236, 4:th joint meeting CED / NOF, Warsaw, August 2000.
    85. Lager A, Svens?ter G, Ericson D.
    Aciduric microflora in dentine caries lesions. J Dent Res 2001;80:737 abstract 1687 (IADR abstracts).
    86. Lai S, Lumbau A, Lai V, Posadino A-M, Tadolini B.
    Carisolv? and odontoblasts. Caries Res 2001;35(4):310 Abstract 138 (48th ORCA Congress).
    87. Markovic D, Zivojinovic V.
    Carisolv method with minimal carious lesions on occlusal surfaces. Abstract SP19-6, 18th IAPD congress, Paris 2001.
    88. Markovic D.
    Preventive preparation and Carisolv system. Abstract 317, 6th BaSS Congress, Bucharest, May 2001.
    89. Mason P N, Ferrari M, Calabrese M, Graiff L.
    Correlation between etching time and hybrid layer formation in Carisolv? treated dentin. Abstract IADR/CED, Montpellier, September 1999.
    90. Moran C, Lynch E, Petersson L, Borsboom P.
    Comparison of caries removal using Carisolv? or a conventional slow speed rotary instrument. Caries Res 1999;33:313 abstract 94 (46th ORCA Congress).
    91. Netuschil L, Berakdar M, Lussi A, Reich E.
    Caries excavation in vitro with Carisolv? or burr as evaluated by the DIAGNOdent?. Caries Res 2000;34:337 abstract 86 (47th ORCA Congress).
    92. Nguyen T, Doherty EH, Aboushala A, Kugel G, Perry R.
    Effect of chemomechanical caries removal system on microleakage of composite resin restorations. J Dent Res 2002 IADR abstract 3391.
    93. Nourallah A, Steffen H, Splieth Ch.
    Chemo-mechanical caries removal with Carisolv? and rotating fissure cleaning brushes. Caries Res 2002:;36(3):187 abstract 40.
    94. Pawlowska E.
    Tensile bond strength after Carisolv? treatment of primary teeth. Abstract 60, 5:th EAPD meeting, Bergen, June 2000.
    95. Perdig?o J, Cardoso P.E.C, Lopes M, Moura S.K, Geraldeli S, Cardoso J.M.S.
    Effect of Carisolv? on the hybrid layer. J Dent Res 2000;79:537 abstract 3149 ( IADR abstracts).
    96. Robling-Reeves J, Platt J, Carlson T.
    Chemo-mechanical caries removal and dentin shear bond strength on Fuji II LC. Proceedings of the Indiana Dental School Research Day 2002;P17.
    97. Russo EMA, Carvalho RCR, Andrade AP, Pagliari AF, Campos KB.
    Effect of chemo-mechanical caries removal on dentin bonding. J Dent Res 2001;80:555 abstract 0229 (IADR abstracts).
    98. Semprum AC, Almeida J, Peters MC, N?r JE, Myaki SI, Tanji EY.
    The effect of different caries removal techniques on the ultrastructure of dentin. J Dent Res 2002 IADR abstract 1903.
    99. Suda S, Maseki T, Nara Y, Tanaka H.
    Bonding of resin adhesive system to dentin treated with chemo-mechanical caries removal system Carisolv?. J Dent Res 2000;79:372 abstract 1829 (IADR abstracts).
    100. Suda S, Maseki T, Kimishima T, Nara Y, Tanaka H.
    Effects of various types of dentin treated with/without Carisolv? on bonding of an adhesive system. J Dent Res 2001;80:555 abstract 0228 (IADR abstracts).
    101. Tonami K, Tagaki T, Araki K, Kurosaki N.
    Effects of the amino acids in Carisolv? on carious dentin. J Dent Res 2001;80:674 abstract 1179 (IADR abstracts).
    102. *Wennerberg A, Sawase T.
    The influence of Carisolv? on enamel and dentin surface topography. J Dent Res 1998;77:972 abstract 2723 (IADR abstracts).
    103. Yazici AR, Atilla P, Ozgunaltay G, Muftuoglu S.
    Comparison of the efficacy of Carisolv and conventional rotary instruments in caries removal. Caries Res 2002;36(3):187 abstract 41.
    104. *Young C, Bongenhielm U.
    A randomized, controlled and blinded histological evaluation of Carisolv? on pulpal tissue. Abstract 59, 82:nd NOF meeting, Naantali, August 1999.
    Other
    105. Patient Follow-up, Swedish Dentists,
    Up-dated Final report, September 1998. a2KF1872-0, Internal report by Medi Team, 1998, Compiled according to European Standard EN 540.
    106. Patient Follow-up, German Dentists,
    Final report, October 1998. a2KF1912-0, Internal report by Medi Team, 1998, Compiled according to European Standard EN 540.
    Textbook
    107.Albrektsson T, Bratthall D, Glantz P-O, Lindhe J (eds).
    Tissue preservation in caries treatment. Quintessence ISBN 1-85097-046-7

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    ?

    , , t 1999.
    Abstracts — Pre-clinical studies
    57. Attari N, Roberts GJ, Ashley P.
    Children's anxiety during caries removal: Carisolv compared with dental drill. J Dent Res 2001;80:674 abstract 1178 (IADR abstracts).
    58. Baysan A, Whiley R, Lynch E.
    Antimicrobial assessment of Carisolv on primary root caries ex-vivo. Abstract 58, 82:nd IADR/NOF, Naantali, August 1999.
    59. Braun A, Christian S, Frentzen M.
    Chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv) in comparison to conventional methods of caries excavation. Caries Res 2001;35(4):310 Abstract 139 (48th ORCA Congress).
    60. Caldo-Teixeira AS, Puppin-Rontani RM.
    Effect of sodium hipochloride on the different dentin substrates – a SEM analyses. J Dent Res 2002 IADR abstract 2605.
    61. Cardoso PEC, Moura SK, Miranda JR, Santos JFF.
    Caries removal: SEM analysis. J Dent Res 2001;80: abstract 317 (AADR/CADR abstracts).
    62. Cornell A, Cornell D, Ericson D.
    The SEM appearance of dentin surfaces and hybrid layers after excavation with Carisolv and a rose-burr. Abstract P29, IADR/NOF, Copenhagen, 2001
    63. Castilho GAA, Rossi FM, Campos WRC, Ferreira RC, Nogueira-Moreira A, Magalhaes CS.
    In vitro evaluation of chemo-mechanical and hand axcavation of carious dentin. Abstract IADR/Brazil, September 2002.
    64. *Dammaschke T, Stratmann U, Ott K.
    Histocytological evaluation on the reaction of pulp and dentin to Carisolv. Abstract AFG-Jahrestagung, Mainz, January 1999.
    65. *Dammaschke T, Stratmann U, Kaup M, Ott K.
    Histologische Ver?nderungen an intaktem und demineralisierten Dentin durch Carisolv. Abstract 13:th Annual Congress of DGZ, Saarbrücken, June 1999.
    66. *Dammaschke T, D?hne L, Kaup M, Stratmann U, Ott K.
    Effektivit?t von Carisolv im Vergleich zu konventionellen Methoden zur Entfernung kari?sen Dentins. Abstract 7:th Annual Congress of GKP, Greifswald, 2000.
    67. Dondi dall'Orologio G, Lorenzi R, Anselmi M.
    Chemo-mechanical vs mechanical caries removal, evaluated with Diagnodent. Abstract IADR/CED, Rome, September 2001.
    68. Erhardt MCG, Amaral CM, Bedran de Castro AKB, Pimenta LAF.
    Influence of use of Carisolv in dentin adhesion. J Dent Res 2001;80: abstract 028 (AADR/CADR abstracts).
    69. Ericson D.
    The efficacy of a new gel for chemo-mechanical caries removal. J Dent Res 1998;77(5):1252 abstract 360.
    70. Frankenberger R, Oberschachtsiek H, Kr?mer N, Petschelt A.
    Bond strength to dentin after mechanical and chemical removal of simulated caries. J Dent Res 1999;78:232 abstract 1015 (IADR abstracts).
    71. Frankenberger R, Oberschachtisiek H, Kr?mer N, Petschelt A.
    Microtensil bond strength to primary dentin after chemomechanical caries removal. J Dent Res 2000;79:372 abstract 1831 (IADR abstracts).
    72. Galler G, Duschner H, G?tz H.
    Migration of Carisolv into sound dentin in vitro: 3D histotomographic studies by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Caries Res 2000;34:338 abstract 88 (47th ORCA Congress).
    73. *Haak R, Fritz U B, Faber F J, Noack M J.
    Influence of chemomechanical caries removal on dentin bonding. J Dent Res 1999;78:369 abstract 2111 (IADR abstracts).
    74. Haffner C, Benz C, Hickel R.
    Efficacy of chemo-mechanical removal of caries. Abstract CONSEURO 2000, Bologna, May 2000.
    75. Hahn P, Trefonski A, Hellwig E.
    Effektivit?t von Fluoridirungsmassnahmen im Wurzeldentin nach Kariesentfernung mit Carisolv. Abstract Jahrestagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Grundlagenforschung, Mainz, January 2001.
    76. *Hannig M, Hoth W.
    Ultrastructural investigation of dentinal surfaces exposed to Carisolv solution. J Dent Res 2000;79:276 abstract 1063 (IADR abstracts).
    77. Harada N, Sonoda H, Shimada Y, Inai N, Otsuki M, Tagami J.
    Effect of chemo-mechanical caries removal on dentin bonding. J Dent Res 2000;79:372 abstract 1832 (IADR abstracts).
    78. *Hosoya Y, Kawashita Y, Goto G.
    Influence of Carisolv on resin adhesion to dentin. J Dent Res 2000;79:372 abstract 1830 (IADR abstracts).
    79. Inaba D, Nagai Y, Minami K, Yonemitsu M, Matsuda K.
    Combined effects of APF and Carisolv? application on acid resistance of dentine lesions in vitro. Caries Res 2000;34:334 abstract 75 (47th ORCA Congress).
    80. Kakaboura A, Eliades G, Vougiouklakis G.
    Effect of Carisolv? on the molecular composition and topography of carious and sound dentin. Abstract IADR/CED, Montpellier, September 1999.
    81. *Kneist S, Heinrich-Weltzien R, St?sser L.
    The occurrence of S. Mutans on the cavity floor after chemo-mechanical caries removal. Abstract IUMS meeting, Sydney, August 1999.
    82. *Kneist S, Heinrich-Weltzien R, St?sser L.
    Zum Vorkommen von Mutans-Streptokokken am Kavit?tenboden von Milchmolaren nach Kariesexkavation mit Carisolv?. Abstract Jahrestagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Grundlagenforschung, Mainz, January 2002.
    83. *Kneist S, Heinrich-Weltzien R, Stoesser L.
    The microflora on the cavity floor after chemo-mechanical caries removal. Caries Res 2002;36(3):197 abstract 72.
    84. Lager A, Thornqvist E, Ericson D.
    Comparison of bacteria in dentine after caries excavation using rose-bur or Carisolv?. Abstract 236, 4:th joint meeting CED / NOF, Warsaw, August 2000.
    85. Lager A, Svens?ter G, Ericson D.
    Aciduric microflora in dentine caries lesions. J Dent Res 2001;80:737 abstract 1687 (IADR abstracts).
    86. Lai S, Lumbau A, Lai V, Posadino A-M, Tadolini B.
    Carisolv? and odontoblasts. Caries Res 2001;35(4):310 Abstract 138 (48th ORCA Congress).
    87. Markovic D, Zivojinovic V.
    Carisolv method with minimal carious lesions on occlusal surfaces. Abstract SP19-6, 18th IAPD congress, Paris 2001.
    88. Markovic D.
    Preventive preparation and Carisolv system. Abstract 317, 6th BaSS Congress, Bucharest, May 2001.
    89. Mason P N, Ferrari M, Calabrese M, Graiff L.
    Correlation between etching time and hybrid layer formation in Carisolv? treated dentin. Abstract IADR/CED, Montpellier, September 1999.
    90. Moran C, Lynch E, Petersson L, Borsboom P.
    Comparison of caries removal using Carisolv? or a conventional slow speed rotary instrument. Caries Res 1999;33:313 abstract 94 (46th ORCA Congress).
    91. Netuschil L, Berakdar M, Lussi A, Reich E.
    Caries excavation in vitro with Carisolv? or burr as evaluated by the DIAGNOdent?. Caries Res 2000;34:337 abstract 86 (47th ORCA Congress).
    92. Nguyen T, Doherty EH, Aboushala A, Kugel G, Perry R.
    Effect of chemomechanical caries removal system on microleakage of composite resin restorations. J Dent Res 2002 IADR abstract 3391.
    93. Nourallah A, Steffen H, Splieth Ch.
    Chemo-mechanical caries removal with Carisolv? and rotating fissure cleaning brushes. Caries Res 2002:;36(3):187 abstract 40.
    94. Pawlowska E.
    Tensile bond strength after Carisolv? treatment of primary teeth. Abstract 60, 5:th EAPD meeting, Bergen, June 2000.
    95. Perdig?o J, Cardoso P.E.C, Lopes M, Moura S.K, Geraldeli S, Cardoso J.M.S.
    Effect of Carisolv? on the hybrid layer. J Dent Res 2000;79:537 abstract 3149 ( IADR abstracts).
    96. Robling-Reeves J, Platt J, Carlson T.
    Chemo-mechanical caries removal and dentin shear bond strength on Fuji II LC. Proceedings of the Indiana Dental School Research Day 2002;P17.
    97. Russo EMA, Carvalho RCR, Andrade AP, Pagliari AF, Campos KB.
    Effect of chemo-mechanical caries removal on dentin bonding. J Dent Res 2001;80:555 abstract 0229 (IADR abstracts).
    98. Semprum AC, Almeida J, Peters MC, N?r JE, Myaki SI, Tanji EY.
    The effect of different caries removal techniques on the ultrastructure of dentin. J Dent Res 2002 IADR abstract 1903.
    99. Suda S, Maseki T, Nara Y, Tanaka H.
    Bonding of resin adhesive system to dentin treated with chemo-mechanical caries removal system Carisolv?. J Dent Res 2000;79:372 abstract 1829 (IADR abstracts).
    100. Suda S, Maseki T, Kimishima T, Nara Y, Tanaka H.
    Effects of various types of dentin treated with/without Carisolv? on bonding of an adhesive system. J Dent Res 2001;80:555 abstract 0228 (IADR abstracts).
    101. Tonami K, Tagaki T, Araki K, Kurosaki N.
    Effects of the amino acids in Carisolv? on carious dentin. J Dent Res 2001;80:674 abstract 1179 (IADR abstracts).
    102. *Wennerberg A, Sawase T.
    The influence of Carisolv? on enamel and dentin surface topography. J Dent Res 1998;77:972 abstract 2723 (IADR abstracts).
    103. Yazici AR, Atilla P, Ozgunaltay G, Muftuoglu S.
    Comparison of the efficacy of Carisolv and conventional rotary instruments in caries removal. Caries Res 2002;36(3):187 abstract 41.
    104. *Young C, Bongenhielm U.
    A randomized, controlled and blinded histological evaluation of Carisolv? on pulpal tissue. Abstract 59, 82:nd NOF meeting, Naantali, August 1999.
    Other
    105. Patient Follow-up, Swedish Dentists,
    Up-dated Final report, September 1998. a2KF1872-0, Internal report by Medi Team, 1998, Compiled according to European Standard EN 540.
    106. Patient Follow-up, German Dentists,
    Final report, October 1998. a2KF1912-0, Internal report by Medi Team, 1998, Compiled according to European Standard EN 540.
    Textbook
    107.Albrektsson T, Bratthall D, Glantz P-O, Lindhe J (eds).
    Tissue preservation in caries treatment. Quintessence ISBN 1-85097-046-7





    猜你喜欢
    云南11选5技巧
  • <div id="y09gn"></div>
  • <li id="y09gn"></li>
    <dl id="y09gn"></dl>
    <div id="y09gn"><s id="y09gn"></s></div>
  • <div id="y09gn"></div>
  • <li id="y09gn"></li>
    <dl id="y09gn"></dl>
    <div id="y09gn"><s id="y09gn"></s></div>
    重庆时时彩2星杀号 足彩半全场技巧 爱彩人彩票网走势图 11选五5开奖结果 7星彩怎么才算中奖 3d彩票走势图预测方法 近100期河南22选5福彩走势图 快乐扑克三开奖结果 2019白小姐透特图 七星彩开奖结果查询 牛牛教学视频教程 超级门将系统 辽宁快乐12落号走势图 广西快三怎么算和值 云南快乐十分选号办法